Building a Stranger Things EDH Deck: When Your Wife Chooses the Chaos

Some time ago, a friend gave me a full Stranger Things Magic set. My first thought: “Cool… but what do I actually do with this?” I’m not usually one for Universes Beyond sets, and honestly, most of the cards were a little intimidating.

Then, inspiration struck—or maybe it was desperation. I handed the stack to my wife and said, “Build me a deck. Use some or all of these cards.”

Her answer? All of them. Every single one.

So what you’re looking at now is my Stranger Things deck—an EDH deck that isn’t just about winning, it’s about capturing the vibe of the show in cardboard form. Weird, chaotic, sometimes nonsensical, but unmistakably Stranger Things.

Here are a few highlights of her choices and why they fit the show perfectly:

Trumpeting Gnarr – The loud, unpredictable chaos of the Upside Down itself. Every time this hits the board, you feel the tension rising.
Othelm, Sigardian Outcast – The outsider who knows things nobody else does. Classic Hopper energy.
Door to Nothingness – A literal portal to another dimension, a nod to the Upside Down’s creepy, existential horror.
Snapdax, Apex of the Hunt – Think of this as the Demogorgon, stalking your opponents’ resources.
Mythos of Snapdax – The creeping sense that something is just… wrong. Perfect for the show’s suspense.

Mechanically, the deck doesn’t play like a typical competitive EDH deck. There are some cards that are “standalone,” and some that feel like narrative easter eggs. But that’s the point: the story at the table is what matters here. It’s chaotic, fun, and perfectly themed for Stranger Things.

It’s honestly one of the most unique decks I’ve ever played, and I have to credit my wife for turning a pile of gift cards into something special. Every game feels like an episode, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

So if you’ve ever wondered what a Stranger Things EDH deck looks like… this is it. Chaos, narrative, and a few Demogorgons thrown in for good measure.

here is the link to the deck

https://moxfield.com/decks/eHdlZaKkIECSROCoGSHwZg

Comments

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.” Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Eminence is NOT Broken!

Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...

Lab Notes!

Search This Blog