Skip to main content

Eminence is NOT Broken!

 


Eminence is NOT Broken!

So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close.

The Setup

A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that.

What I did see was this:

  • I was casting 1–2 spells per turn

  • They were casting 2–3 spells per turn

  • Almost every spell came with extra triggers

  • Their boards naturally created synergy webs

And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post.

Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution.

What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in)

Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks), precons were built very differently.

1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal

Wizards leaned into slower, splashier gameplay:

  • Higher mana curves

  • Fewer cheap interaction pieces

  • Big, dramatic spells over efficiency

Games were meant to build up, not snowball early.

2. Less Built-In Synergy

Older precons often felt like:

  • “Here’s a theme… good luck assembling it.”

You’d get:

  • A few tribal payoffs

  • Some unrelated value cards

  • Minimal internal engines

Compare that to modern decks where:

  • Cards are designed to chain together naturally

  • You don’t have to “find” synergy—it’s baked in

3. Card Advantage Was Scarce

In 2017:

  • Drawing extra cards required work

  • Engines were fragile or expensive

In modern design:

  • Card advantage is expected, not earned

  • Many cards replace themselves or generate value immediately

That’s why your opponents felt like they were doing more every turn—because they literally are.

The Big Shift: “Make the Deck Work Out of the Box”

Starting around 2020 and accelerating through things like Commander Legends and Commander Masters, Wizards changed their approach:

Modern Precon Philosophy:

  • Synergy first (cards are designed to interact immediately)

  • Lower curve (more plays per turn)

  • Redundancy (multiple copies of the same effect)

  • Immediate impact (ETB triggers, cast triggers, value on resolution)

Their goal became:

“A new player should sit down, play this deck, and feel like it works.”

Why Your Game Felt So Different

You weren’t just seeing “new cards vs old cards.”

You were seeing:

2017 Deck2026 Deck
Plays one spellPlays multiple spells
Needs setupSelf-synergizing
Wins lateBuilds advantage early
Value is earnedValue is automatic

That’s a philosophy gap, not just a power gap.

So… Is This Power Creep?

Kind of—but not in the way people usually mean.

This isn’t just “cards are stronger.”

It’s:

  • Consistency creep

  • Synergy creep

  • Efficiency creep

Modern decks don’t just hit harder—they function smoother.

And About Eminence…

Here’s the spicy part.

Mechanics like Eminence (from 2017) feel broken because they generate value outside the game state—but ironically, modern design has caught up in a different way:

  • Today’s cards generate value on cast, on ETB, on attack, on death

  • You don’t need Eminence when every card is a mini-engine

So the real takeaway isn’t:

“Eminence is broken”

It’s:

“Eminence was ahead of its time… and now everything else caught up.”

Final Thought (Strong Closing)

That game showed me something I didn’t expect:

It’s not that old Commander decks are bad.

It’s that new Commander decks are designed to play Magic the way we wish our old decks did.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Weakest Deck at the Table Still Wins (Supplement)

  The Weakest Deck at the Table Still Wins I don't usually do this. Most of what I make lives in the video and stays there. But the deck tech format only gives me so much room — rapid-fire card talk doesn't leave space for the why behind the picks, and some of that why is worth more than a soundbite. So I'm trying something new: a written companion piece to go with the video, digging into the parts that didn't fit. If this is useful, let me know — I'd like to know whether it's worth doing again for future videos, or whether it's better left as a one-off. I don't remember the games this deck has lost. That's not me being modest, and it's not selective bragging either — it's just true. I can tell you the exact turn Whiptongue Hydra cleared a sky full of dragons. I can tell you what it felt like when a $25 deck put a $400 deck in the graveyard. Ask me about a loss, though, and I've got nothing specific. My brain doesn't file those aw...
Post a Comment
Read more
  Nobody's Coming for You Personally (And That's Why You Should Play Harder) Derrick from Super Fast Tortoise said something on his morning show that made me stop and think: he wants to play more assertively. Maybe even aggressively. My first instinct was the same one every Commander player has: careful, that's how arms races start. I don't think that's true. Here's why. Two Different Levers "Assertive play" is a mindset. How you pilot. Develop every turn. Take the line instead of waiting for a safer one. Apply pressure. You can do all of that with a Bracket 2 precon. An "arms race" is a deckbuilding problem. Cards getting swapped for stronger cards, session after session, until nobody's having fun even though everyone's winning more. Two different levers. You can pull one without the other. I've watched a totally passive stax pile — hold everything up, combo off turn twenty — that's more of an arms-race deck than an a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Slopification of Magic: The Gathering — A Game Eating Itself

  If you've been playing since the Urza block, the Mirrodin era, the original Ravnica, or even just early Innistrad — you know what I mean. You remember what it felt like when a new set dropped and it felt like a gift, not a product launch. That feeling isn't gone. But it's getting harder to find. The Slopification of Magic: The Gathering — A Game Eating Itself By a long-time player who remembers what it used to feel like There's a word floating around internet culture right now: slop . It refers to the flood of low-effort, algorithmically-generated, quantity-over-quality content that increasingly drowns out anything made with genuine care. We see it in AI-generated images, in streaming content, in fast fashion. And if you've been playing Magic: The Gathering for more than a few years, you've been watching it happen to your favorite card game — slowly at first, then all at once. I've been playing Magic for a long time. Long enough to remember when a ...
Post a Comment
Read more