Skip to main content

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

 

I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

“A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.” 

 

Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus.

Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.”

If anything, they just punish you for it.

Because here’s the truth: if you want to be a “nice guy,” if you want to play “honest Magic” and ignore the Alchemy dumpster fire, Arena will chew you up and spit you out. You’ll lose to some nonsense digital-only card that warps reality and you’ll have no one to blame but your own moral high ground.

And if Machiavelli were around, I’m pretty sure he’d pat me on the shoulder and say: “See? Nice guys finish last.”

So what’s the move? Simple: stop playing nice. If Arena wants me to break the game, then I’ll break the game. If Wizards is going to shovel chaos onto my plate, then I’m going to take a fork and eat it like dessert.

That’s why I’ve built this little monstrosity. A turn-three win combo. No fluff, no mercy, no apologies. If they want me to swim in a shark tank, then I’ll sharpen my own teeth.

Here’s how it works (decklist incoming below).

Stay tuned—because this isn’t about playing fair. This is about surviving in the digital Thunderdome. And trust me, Tibalt’s Apprentice isn’t finishing last.

 

Deck
4 Val, Marooned Surveyor (Y25) 26
4 Plains (ZNR) 268
4 Mountain (ONE) 275
4 Llanowar Elves (M19) 314
4 Trelasarra, Moon Dancer (HBG) 251
3 Lotus Cobra (ZNR) 193
1 Tifa Lockhart (FIN) 206
3 Eumidian Terrabotanist (EOE) 180
1 A-Druid Class (AFR) 180
4 Soul Warden (M10) 34
2 Gaea's Blessing (DAR) 161
4 Authority of the Consuls (FDN) 137
4 Case of the Uneaten Feast (MKM) 10
4 Collected Company (AKR) 186
3 Brushland (BRO) 259
2 Overgrown Farmland (MID) 265
2 Razorverge Thicket (ONE) 257
4 Temple Garden (GRN) 258
4 Aether Hub (KLR) 279
 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Eminence is NOT Broken!

  Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...
Post a Comment
Read more

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

  The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...
Post a Comment
Read more