Skip to main content

Lab Report 60: From Mad Saxxon to Mentor: Why Commander Should Stay Fun

 


From Mad Saxxon to Mentor: Why Commander Should Stay Fun

There was a time—long ago, when my beard was less gray and my plays were a lot wilder—when I earned the nickname Mad Saxxon. Why? Because in the middle of a brutal match, someone once said:

“You’d cut off your own arm just to beat someone to death with it!”

And honestly… they weren’t wrong. That was my vibe back then. Winning wasn’t enough—I wanted to win with fire, with style, with absolute chaos.

But time (and Magic formats) have a way of shaping you. My headspace has changed, my opinions and strategies have shifted, and I’ve learned that Commander is a whole different beast.

Now, as I work with other creators on bringing new players into this format, I’ll admit—I almost overthought it. I was looking at the enormity of the task, the endless possibilities, the labyrinth of Commander politics and deckbuilding. I was making it way too complex.

Here’s the truth:
This is a game. It should be fun.

The job isn’t to spoon-feed every line of play or drown a new player in encyclopedic deck techs. The job is to give them the framework—a place to start, a way in—and then let them discover the depth they love on their own.

Some will fall for the math. Some will fall for the story. Some will just want to slam giant Dragons on the table and laugh when they die. That’s the beauty of Commander: there’s room for all of it.

And me? I still carry that Mad Saxxon spark—the part of me that would gleefully hurl my own arm at the board if it meant making a statement. But now, I also know that the real joy of Commander is watching someone else’s spark catch fire for the first time.

So as I prep for the shows ahead, here’s my promise: I’ll keep the framework strong, the advice simple, and the fun as the priority. Because at the end of the day, Commander isn’t about finishing first. It’s about loving the game enough to come back for the next one.

 

~M 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

  I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.”    Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lab Report 001: The Binary Trap — Why Fun Should Be the Goal

 LAB REPORT 001: The Binary Trap — Why Fun Should Be the Goal Commander is one of the richest formats in Magic, but all too often I see players fall into what I call the binary trap . It's the idea that there's only one acceptable outcome: winning. When winning is your only goal, the game becomes black and white—either you win and have fun, or you lose and walk away disappointed. Every card, every turn, every interaction is judged by whether it contributes to a victory, and if it doesn’t, it’s seen as a waste. That’s a lot of pressure to put on a game. But when you make fun your primary objective, the whole game opens up. Suddenly, there are infinite shades of gray between winning and losing. You start to notice the little victories—the perfect topdeck, the unlikely combo that almost goes off, the chaos you unleash with a single card. You laugh more. You engage more. You remember more. Fun doesn’t have to be the opposite of winning—it can include it—but it’s far more susta...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lab Report 24: Why Archenemy is the Perfect Format for Streaming

  Lab Report 24: Why Archenemy is the Perfect Format for Streaming by madsaxxon, Tibalt’s Apprentice So here’s a spicy take for the streamers, the guests, and the chaos gremlins alike: Archenemy might just be the perfect way to play Commander on stream. I had the chance to join a streamed Archenemy game hosted by Jake the Lithomancer . Jake’s known for combining janky brews, flavorful storytelling, and just enough chaos to keep things unpredictable. You’ll find him streaming these wild Commander sessions on Twitch and sharing game highlights and deckbuilding thoughts over at @jake_the_lithomancer . Now, let’s get the basics out of the way—Archenemy is a variant format where one player becomes “the archenemy” and takes on a team of three opponents. The twist? The archenemy starts with 40 life, draws two cards per turn, and gets a ridiculous bonus each turn from a deck of scheme cards—oversized, splashy effects that feel like a blend between cheating and plot armor. And yes, it’...
Post a Comment
Read more