Skip to main content

Lab Report 60: From Mad Saxxon to Mentor: Why Commander Should Stay Fun

 


From Mad Saxxon to Mentor: Why Commander Should Stay Fun

There was a time—long ago, when my beard was less gray and my plays were a lot wilder—when I earned the nickname Mad Saxxon. Why? Because in the middle of a brutal match, someone once said:

“You’d cut off your own arm just to beat someone to death with it!”

And honestly… they weren’t wrong. That was my vibe back then. Winning wasn’t enough—I wanted to win with fire, with style, with absolute chaos.

But time (and Magic formats) have a way of shaping you. My headspace has changed, my opinions and strategies have shifted, and I’ve learned that Commander is a whole different beast.

Now, as I work with other creators on bringing new players into this format, I’ll admit—I almost overthought it. I was looking at the enormity of the task, the endless possibilities, the labyrinth of Commander politics and deckbuilding. I was making it way too complex.

Here’s the truth:
This is a game. It should be fun.

The job isn’t to spoon-feed every line of play or drown a new player in encyclopedic deck techs. The job is to give them the framework—a place to start, a way in—and then let them discover the depth they love on their own.

Some will fall for the math. Some will fall for the story. Some will just want to slam giant Dragons on the table and laugh when they die. That’s the beauty of Commander: there’s room for all of it.

And me? I still carry that Mad Saxxon spark—the part of me that would gleefully hurl my own arm at the board if it meant making a statement. But now, I also know that the real joy of Commander is watching someone else’s spark catch fire for the first time.

So as I prep for the shows ahead, here’s my promise: I’ll keep the framework strong, the advice simple, and the fun as the priority. Because at the end of the day, Commander isn’t about finishing first. It’s about loving the game enough to come back for the next one.

 

~M 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Weakest Deck at the Table Still Wins (Supplement)

  The Weakest Deck at the Table Still Wins I don't usually do this. Most of what I make lives in the video and stays there. But the deck tech format only gives me so much room — rapid-fire card talk doesn't leave space for the why behind the picks, and some of that why is worth more than a soundbite. So I'm trying something new: a written companion piece to go with the video, digging into the parts that didn't fit. If this is useful, let me know — I'd like to know whether it's worth doing again for future videos, or whether it's better left as a one-off. I don't remember the games this deck has lost. That's not me being modest, and it's not selective bragging either — it's just true. I can tell you the exact turn Whiptongue Hydra cleared a sky full of dragons. I can tell you what it felt like when a $25 deck put a $400 deck in the graveyard. Ask me about a loss, though, and I've got nothing specific. My brain doesn't file those aw...
Post a Comment
Read more
  Nobody's Coming for You Personally (And That's Why You Should Play Harder) Derrick from Super Fast Tortoise said something on his morning show that made me stop and think: he wants to play more assertively. Maybe even aggressively. My first instinct was the same one every Commander player has: careful, that's how arms races start. I don't think that's true. Here's why. Two Different Levers "Assertive play" is a mindset. How you pilot. Develop every turn. Take the line instead of waiting for a safer one. Apply pressure. You can do all of that with a Bracket 2 precon. An "arms race" is a deckbuilding problem. Cards getting swapped for stronger cards, session after session, until nobody's having fun even though everyone's winning more. Two different levers. You can pull one without the other. I've watched a totally passive stax pile — hold everything up, combo off turn twenty — that's more of an arms-race deck than an a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Slopification of Magic: The Gathering — A Game Eating Itself

  If you've been playing since the Urza block, the Mirrodin era, the original Ravnica, or even just early Innistrad — you know what I mean. You remember what it felt like when a new set dropped and it felt like a gift, not a product launch. That feeling isn't gone. But it's getting harder to find. The Slopification of Magic: The Gathering — A Game Eating Itself By a long-time player who remembers what it used to feel like There's a word floating around internet culture right now: slop . It refers to the flood of low-effort, algorithmically-generated, quantity-over-quality content that increasingly drowns out anything made with genuine care. We see it in AI-generated images, in streaming content, in fast fashion. And if you've been playing Magic: The Gathering for more than a few years, you've been watching it happen to your favorite card game — slowly at first, then all at once. I've been playing Magic for a long time. Long enough to remember when a ...
Post a Comment
Read more