Lab Report 33: Topdecking Life

Lab Report 33: Topdecking Life

Sometimes I catch myself topdecking my way through life.

You know that feeling—just pulling the next idea off the top of your brain and running with it. Hit record. Toss it on YouTube. Move on. There’s something wild and satisfying about that spontaneity, and I won’t lie… it’s fun. A little chaotic maybe, but fun.

But lately, I’ve been thinking a little deeper about it. I’ve talked before about how I’m trying to play more chess—not just for fun, but to teach myself patience. The same lesson applies here: maybe I don’t need to topdeck every piece of content. Maybe I'd get better results if I slowed down just a bit and spent more time polishing the projects I care about.

Here’s the real struggle though: I’m incredibly grateful for everyone who follows me—on YouTube, Instagram, the store, wherever. That support means everything. And sometimes that gratitude turns into pressure. I catch myself thinking, “I need to hurry up and post something—anything—before people lose interest.”

But then I realize: rushing isn't always the move. Even in Magic, topdecking is only exciting when you've set yourself up for success. Sometimes, digging a little deeper—sitting with an idea longer, giving it room to breathe—makes all the difference.

So here I am, stream-of-consciousness style, sharing where I’m at. What about you? Do you feel like you’re topdecking life? Are you just reacting to whatever comes your way, or are you starting to dig a little deeper to improve your own life, your projects, your passions?

Leave a comment and let me know—I’d love to hear how you’re navigating that balance.

Comments

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.” Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Eminence is NOT Broken!

Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...

Lab Notes!

Search This Blog