Lab Report 27: The Great Dalmuti – A Forgotten Feast of Cards?

🧪 Lab Report 27: The Great Dalmuti – A Forgotten Feast of Cards?

I want to talk about a game that has quietly held a little piece of my heart for years: The Great Dalmuti.

Now, most people know Magic: The Gathering, and some even know Kingdoms, Archenemy, or other alt-format side games we Magic players love to break out for a change of pace. But this one? The Great Dalmuti? It’s obscure. So obscure, in fact, that I almost never get to play it anymore. And honestly? That makes me a little sad.

Because The Great Dalmuti is brilliant. It’s easy to teach, hard to master, and hilarious in the right group. It’s got just enough strategy to keep things interesting and just enough social chaos to get people roleplaying the Dalmuti and Peon roles like they were born to boss—or be bossed.

Designed by Richard Garfield (yes, that Richard Garfield), it’s a ladder-style shedding game where your rank matters. If you win, you’re the Great Dalmuti. If you lose? Well, welcome to life as the Greater Peon, my friend. And you will be giving your best cards to the Dalmuti next round, like a good little vassal.

It’s a card game about climbing (or slipping) down a fictional feudal class system, and while that sounds oppressive, it’s a riot when played with friends. Power trades hands quickly, and victory can be snatched from smug faces in the blink of a turn.

🎩 Why It’s Great:

No board, just a unique deck.
Lightning-fast rounds.
Strategic shedding and social antics.
Wild card “Jesters” spice up plays.
Encourages table banter and playful tyranny.
Easy to teach to anyone—no TCG background needed.

😢 Why It’s Rare:

But here's the rub. It never really caught on. It’s niche. It’s not flashy. It doesn’t have booster packs. It doesn’t get tournaments or Commander Nights. And so, it's slowly fading away. I almost never get to play it. It’s one of those games that lives in the shadows of gaming shelves, whispered about but rarely dealt.

As far as I know, it is still in print via Wizards of the Coast / Avalon Hill, but just barely. You might still find it online or tucked away in the odd FLGS if you look.

So why bring it up now?

Because I want to know: Is there anyone else out there who plays this game?
Does it still live somewhere in the wilds of game nights across the globe?
Is The Great Dalmuti fated to become just a curious footnote in the Garfield gameography?

I hope not.

And maybe—just maybe—this little Lab Report reaches someone who remembers, who’s played, or who wants to. If you’ve got a copy, dust it off. Get some friends. Bring the chaos. Play the roles. Live the ridiculous hierarchy. And then tell me about it.

Let’s not let this gem slip into the void.

—
Signed,
Madsaxxon
Tibalt’s Apprentice

Comments

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.” Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Eminence is NOT Broken!

Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...

Lab Notes!

Search This Blog