Skip to main content

Lab Report 27: The Great Dalmuti – A Forgotten Feast of Cards?

 

๐Ÿงช Lab Report 27: The Great Dalmuti – A Forgotten Feast of Cards?

I want to talk about a game that has quietly held a little piece of my heart for years: The Great Dalmuti.

Now, most people know Magic: The Gathering, and some even know Kingdoms, Archenemy, or other alt-format side games we Magic players love to break out for a change of pace. But this one? The Great Dalmuti? It’s obscure. So obscure, in fact, that I almost never get to play it anymore. And honestly? That makes me a little sad.

Because The Great Dalmuti is brilliant. It’s easy to teach, hard to master, and hilarious in the right group. It’s got just enough strategy to keep things interesting and just enough social chaos to get people roleplaying the Dalmuti and Peon roles like they were born to boss—or be bossed.

Designed by Richard Garfield (yes, that Richard Garfield), it’s a ladder-style shedding game where your rank matters. If you win, you’re the Great Dalmuti. If you lose? Well, welcome to life as the Greater Peon, my friend. And you will be giving your best cards to the Dalmuti next round, like a good little vassal.

It’s a card game about climbing (or slipping) down a fictional feudal class system, and while that sounds oppressive, it’s a riot when played with friends. Power trades hands quickly, and victory can be snatched from smug faces in the blink of a turn.

๐ŸŽฉ Why It’s Great:

  • No board, just a unique deck.

  • Lightning-fast rounds.

  • Strategic shedding and social antics.

  • Wild card “Jesters” spice up plays.

  • Encourages table banter and playful tyranny.

  • Easy to teach to anyone—no TCG background needed.

๐Ÿ˜ข Why It’s Rare:

But here's the rub. It never really caught on. It’s niche. It’s not flashy. It doesn’t have booster packs. It doesn’t get tournaments or Commander Nights. And so, it's slowly fading away. I almost never get to play it. It’s one of those games that lives in the shadows of gaming shelves, whispered about but rarely dealt.

As far as I know, it is still in print via Wizards of the Coast / Avalon Hill, but just barely. You might still find it online or tucked away in the odd FLGS if you look.

So why bring it up now?

Because I want to know: Is there anyone else out there who plays this game?
Does it still live somewhere in the wilds of game nights across the globe?
Is The Great Dalmuti fated to become just a curious footnote in the Garfield gameography?

I hope not.

And maybe—just maybe—this little Lab Report reaches someone who remembers, who’s played, or who wants to. If you’ve got a copy, dust it off. Get some friends. Bring the chaos. Play the roles. Live the ridiculous hierarchy. And then tell me about it.

Let’s not let this gem slip into the void.


Signed,
Madsaxxon
Tibalt’s Apprentice

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

  I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.”    Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Lab Report 001: The Binary Trap — Why Fun Should Be the Goal

 LAB REPORT 001: The Binary Trap — Why Fun Should Be the Goal Commander is one of the richest formats in Magic, but all too often I see players fall into what I call the binary trap . It's the idea that there's only one acceptable outcome: winning. When winning is your only goal, the game becomes black and white—either you win and have fun, or you lose and walk away disappointed. Every card, every turn, every interaction is judged by whether it contributes to a victory, and if it doesn’t, it’s seen as a waste. That’s a lot of pressure to put on a game. But when you make fun your primary objective, the whole game opens up. Suddenly, there are infinite shades of gray between winning and losing. You start to notice the little victories—the perfect topdeck, the unlikely combo that almost goes off, the chaos you unleash with a single card. You laugh more. You engage more. You remember more. Fun doesn’t have to be the opposite of winning—it can include it—but it’s far more susta...

Lab Report 24: Why Archenemy is the Perfect Format for Streaming

  Lab Report 24: Why Archenemy is the Perfect Format for Streaming by madsaxxon, Tibalt’s Apprentice So here’s a spicy take for the streamers, the guests, and the chaos gremlins alike: Archenemy might just be the perfect way to play Commander on stream. I had the chance to join a streamed Archenemy game hosted by Jake the Lithomancer . Jake’s known for combining janky brews, flavorful storytelling, and just enough chaos to keep things unpredictable. You’ll find him streaming these wild Commander sessions on Twitch and sharing game highlights and deckbuilding thoughts over at @jake_the_lithomancer . Now, let’s get the basics out of the way—Archenemy is a variant format where one player becomes “the archenemy” and takes on a team of three opponents. The twist? The archenemy starts with 40 life, draws two cards per turn, and gets a ridiculous bonus each turn from a deck of scheme cards—oversized, splashy effects that feel like a blend between cheating and plot armor. And yes, it’...