Lab Report 039 – Joy of the Shuffle

Ahhh, the joy of paper Magic. There’s nothing quite like it. For the first time in months—literally—I got to crack open a deck box, slide a playmat across a real table, and shuffle up with actual people. No screens, no webcams, no lag, no "whoops, Arena crashed." Just cardboard, conversation, and that unmistakable tactile joy of flicking cards between your fingers like you're weaving spells in real-time.

The journey started with a 35-minute drive to the nearest local game store. Now, if you’re thinking, “That’s a bit of a trek,” you’re not wrong. But let me tell you—it was worth every. single. mile. Walking into a shop that smells like sleeves, strategy, and maybe just a hint of gamer funk felt like coming home.

I met up with a friend, my wife joined in and the three of us just jammed some good old-fashioned Commander. We were soon joined by a fourth for one last round before FNM. It wasn’t about spiking wins or pulling off flashy combos—it was about connection. About laughter when a plan falls apart. About that face someone makes when they topdeck just the right card. About remembering why we fell in love with this game in the first place.

And yes, the White Castle run on the way home was fine—but honestly? If it had been two hours there and back, I’d still say it was worth it. Paper Magic has a soul to it, and I got to feel it again, surrounded by people who remind me why I do all of this in the first place.

So here’s to local game stores, to friends (new and old), to decks that don’t auto-shuffle, and to every little spark of joy we get from a game that just keeps giving.

Stay grateful. Stay shufflin’.

—Tibalt’s Apprentice

Comments

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.” Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Eminence is NOT Broken!

Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...

Lab Notes!

Search This Blog