Skip to main content

Lab Report 011 – Commander Deck Fatigue Is Real

 

Lab Report 011 – Commander Deck Fatigue Is Real

by MaD SaXXon, Tibalt’s Apprentice

I have over 30 Commander decks—and I’m adding more even as I write this. This may be too many.

Back when I was going out to play twice a week, it made sense. I could rotate through up to six decks per session, test ideas, revisit old favorites, and always keep things fresh. But now? I’ve played exactly one paper game in the last two months. A handful of matches on SpellTable, sure, but the rhythm just isn’t there.

So now I’m stuck with this weird pressure: dismantle some decks to focus on a few? That feels like I’m being forced to have fun with what’s left—and that kind of forced fun never really works. In the past, the abundance of both play opportunities and deck options gave me peace of mind. If a game flopped or a deck bricked, no big deal. There was always next time.

But now “next time” isn’t guaranteed.

I’m not writing this because I have the answer. I’m not even sure there is a problem to solve. Maybe this is just part of being a longtime player in a game that’s changed so much. Maybe it’s just a side effect of loving this hobby a lot—maybe too much.

So what do you think, dear reader?
How many decks are too many?
Is it better to have a few you love or a library you rotate through?

Let me know if you’ve found the sweet spot. Or if, like me, you’re still looking for it.

MaD SaXXon, Tibalt’s Apprentice

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

  I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.”    Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Eminence is NOT Broken!

  Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

  The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...