Skip to main content

Field Report 001 – First Contact at the LGS

 

Field Report 001 – First Contact at the LGS

Logged by MaD SaXXon, Tibalt’s Apprentice

My first incursion into the local game store felt more like infiltration than camaraderie.

I arrived early—eager, if not anxious—but for nearly an hour, not a word was spoken to me. Eye contact was a rare commodity, and I felt like a ghost drifting between tables of established pods. Eventually, I summoned what courage I had and asked a nearby group if they could use a fourth. To their credit, I was welcomed in... but not by name. Just:

“What commander are you playing?”
“What does your deck do?”

No names. No banter. Just business.
I tried to keep pace—kept a sketchy opening hand to avoid delay, took my free mulligan, and still ended up with two lands (one of them a bounce land). The table said I could mulligan again, but I didn’t want to push it. I shuffled, drew, and fate handed me yet another two-lander. With 34 lands and several fetches, no less. Classic.

The game went okay—I stumbled out of the gate and didn’t do much until I was already at 13 life. It wasn’t a strong showing, but it was a start.

Next Objective:

For the second visit, I’ll get there earlier. I’ll introduce myself by name. I’ll shake hands, not just reveal commanders. Building a community starts with a conversation—even if you have to cast it first.

Until then,
—MaD SaXXon, Tibalt’s Apprentice


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab Report 059: I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena)

  I Hate Alchemy (and Why Nice Guys Finish Last on Arena) “A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests.”    Let me get this out of the way up front: I hate Alchemy. Hate it. Despise it. The digital-only nonsense, the endless “rebalancing,” the half-baked mechanics that would collapse under their own weight if they ever had to exist in cardboard form—Alchemy feels like Magic’s integrity got fed into a paper shredder just so someone in accounting could hit their quarterly bonus. Sure, the official line is that it keeps the game “fresh” and “exciting.” But let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t about fresh gameplay—it’s about milking the cow until it keels over. And here’s the real kicker: nobody cares. Nobody at Wizards cares that Alchemy cheapens the game. Nobody on the Arena ladder cares if you’re stubbornly refusing to play the busted cards. Nobody gives you a shiny badge of honor for “staying true to real Magic.” If anythin...

Eminence is NOT Broken!

  Eminence is NOT Broken! So I got to see a clear contrast between a 2017 Commander deck and a 2026 Commander deck… and it’s not even close. The Setup A little context: I played a straight-up 2017 precon against three copies of a newer Commander deck (the Ninja Turtles one). They told me the decks were still around “bracket two”—light upgrades at most—and honestly, nothing I saw contradicted that. What I did see was this: I was casting 1–2 spells per turn They were casting 2–3 spells per turn Almost every spell came with extra triggers Their boards naturally created synergy webs And here’s the important part: I still had fun. This isn’t a complaint post—it’s an observation post. Because what I experienced wasn’t just power creep… it was design evolution . What Changed? (This is where WotC philosophy comes in) Back around 2016–2017 (think Magic: The Gathering Commander 2017 decks ), precons were built very differently. 1. “Battlecruiser Magic” Was the Goal Wizar...

The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank

  The New Era of Commander Deck Building: Efficiency vs. the Joy of Jank Commander has exploded in popularity, and with it comes a wave of advice on how to build “better” decks. Recent guides talk about the “new era” of Commander — focusing on templates like the 1-2-3 Utility Conundrum, keeping ramp/draw/removal at 3 mana or less, and “percentile pushing” to hit ideal numbers of interaction while staying on-theme. These ideas make a lot of sense on paper. They help decks run smoother, reduce awkward turns, and let players execute their plans more reliably. But I have to push back a little. I miss the old spirit of Commander — the one where the format was about making cards that were meant to be bad work in ridiculous, wonderful ways. The Shift Toward Efficiency and Synergy Modern deck-building advice pushes hard for efficiency and synergy . Find low-curve utility that lets you ramp fast, draw cards, and answer threats without missing a beat. Look for “sign post cards” that rei...